Rh Bill Case Study Essay

at that place atomic number 18 6 summit of f atomic number 18s pertaining to reproductive health and/or population management that fuddle been filed for deliberation in both the augury of Representatives and the Senate for the 15th Congress.The most controversial of these bills is House Bill No. 96 authored by Rep. Edcel Lagman. House Bill No. 96, also known as the proposed Reproductive Health and Population and Development Act of 2010, will tag the following areas* midwives of skilled attendance* emergency obstetric wield* access to family readying* maternal death review* family planning supplies as of the essence(p) medicines* benefits for serious and life-threatening reproductive health conditions* mobile health care service* mandatory age-appropriate reproductive health and knowledgeableity education* right of local family planning office and certificate of compliance* capability building of barangay health workers* ideal family size* employers responsibilities* mu lti-media campaign* implementing mechanisms* reporting requirements* prohibited acts* penaltiesThe bill is controversial, as it is being opposed by have-to doe with citizens, especially the pro-life, pro-family and pro-God groups, ir look uponive of creed or religion. The Roman Catholic Church expresses its opposition against the bill on umteen counts, most especially the procurement and distri providedion of family planning supplies for the whole country, when the available evidence from peer reviewed medical journals meets the hypothesis that when ovulation and dressing occur in women taking oral contraceptives (OCs) or using intrauterine devices (IUD), post-fertilization effects are operative on occasion to prevent clinically recognized pregnancy. Hormonal contraceptives and/or IUDs directly affect the endometrium. These effects have been presumed to render the endometrium relatively inhospitable to implantation or to the maintenance of the preembryo or embryo prior to clinic ally recognized pregnancy. These make pills and IUDS abortifacient.Pro-life groups, and many professionals in the medical and nursing fields, believe that physicians and policy makers should understand and respect the beliefs of patients who consider human life to be present and valuable from the chip of fertilization. Patients should be made fully aware of this information so that they skunk consent to or refuse the use of artificial contraceptives.However, the position of the Catholic Church and the pro-life groups does not mean that they espouse the attitude of natalism at all costs, as if the number of children, in itself, were the unmistakable sign of sure christian matrimonial life.The sexual act, properly exercised within marriage only, is appointive primarily to the propagation of life. If there are reasonable motives for spacing births, such as serious medical conditions in the m other(a), or extreme poverty, past the Catholic Church teaches that married couples may t ake advantage of the innate cycles of the reproductive system and use their marriage precisely those times that are infertile (natural family planning).Other aspects of the bill being contested by concerned citizens include the classification of family planning supplies as essential medicines when their safety/perniciousness profile and legal permissibility are questionable. At the same time, more impressiveness should be given to the prevalent diseases, the top ten leading causes of morbidity and mortality in the Philippines, namely, infections such as pneumonia and tuberculosis. Financial resources allotted by foreign donors to assist the Philippine government programs could actually be disclose spent towards pursuing health programs targeting communicable diseases than purchasing artificial contraceptives. very pertinent to the tip over about reproduction rights is the right to life. The Philippine composing says that the State shall equally protect the life of the mother a nd the life of the unborn from conception. If artificial contraceptives are medically proven to induce abortion as one of their mechanisms of action, then procurement and distribution of such family planning supplies are unconstitutional and illegal.INTRODUCTIONThe international aid environment has undergone considerable salmagundi in recent years. Internationally, principles of development cooperation. In some countries, civil cabaret has achieved success in navigating the aid architecture and advocating effectively on behalf of sexual and reproductive health (SRH). In other countries, interacting and participating in gravestone development processes has been more challenging due tolack of sufficient data or evidence to make a strong advocacy case, and weak instinct of terminology and processes, making access and influence difficult.For the past two years, WHO has back up the forrard project (completed in January 2011) implemented through with(predicate) the German understr ucture for World Population (DSW). DSW had provided financial and technical support to civil baseball club organisations (CSO) for developing and implementing locally devised advocacy action plans to raise levels of government financing for SRH in three countries. The countries are Bangladesh, the Philippines and Uganda.This report is a case meditate from the AHEAD project in Philippines. The case study begins by describing the socio semipolitical context in which the AHEAD project was implemented. The context covers three themes an storey of civil society movements, situation analysis of sexual and reproductive health and rights and background to the policy environment in the Philippines. The subsequent sections highlight findings from military rank of the project including achievements from the implementation of the advocacy action plan, the challenges faced by AHEAD and finally the lessons learned.Literature ReviewThe Reproductive Health Bill (RH Bill) has drawn opposing opinions from different sectors of the society. There are people who propose and support the RH Bill and there are those who strongly oppose it. some(prenominal) find themselves in a crossroads wherein they agree on received components of the RH Bill but remain doubtful about the other parts. Moral, economic and political conflicts continue to rise between opposing sectors. The debate goes on and on. The primary goal of the RH Bill is to guarantee familiar access to methods and information on birth control and maternal care. There are six bills sharing common goals. There seems to be a general agreement when it comes to maternal and child health care but conflicts have risen concerning the proposal that the private sector and Filipino taxpayers caudex the nationwide distribution of family planning devices to help control the countrys population. Meanwhile, the government shall continue giving out information on their uses through health care centers. Issues and arguments Populat ionThe Philippines has the fastest increment population in south-east Asia. Studies have shown that most pregnancies in the Philippines, especially among the poor, are unplanned. Supporters of the RH bill claim that the increasing population of the country is something that cannot be ignore anymore. RH bill principal author Edcel Lagman give tongue to, The Philippine population is growing at a much faster rate than can be sustained by the government or the countrys resources.Lagman said that the Philippines is the only country in Southeast Asia that does not have a national reproductive health bill. Based on studies made by the University of the Philippines (one example here), the country tops the fertility rate in Southeast Asia at 3.3 percent. Following are Malaysia at 2.5 percent and Vietnam at 2.1 percent.