A Very Brief History on the Existence of God Essay -- Philosophy, Des

The subsequent essay depart provide a brief overview on the instauration of graven image from Ren Descartes done Immanuel Kant. First, section (1), examines Descartes proof for the existence of divinity fudge. Section (2), explores G.W. Leibnizs view on Gods existence in addition to his attempts to rectify the shortcomings of Descartes proofs. The ease of the essay then examines two additional philosophers, David Hume in section (4) and Immanuel Kant in (5), who contend that Gods existence cannot be rationally proven.(1)As a devout Catholic, Descartes undeniably believed in God. He makes his faith unload in the letter of dedication preceding Meditations on First Philosophy. Here, Descartes writes that we must(prenominal) believe in Gods existence because it is taught in the holy Scriptures, and, conversely, that we must believe in the Holy Scriptures because they have come from God (Descartes, 1). Nevertheless, in the beginning of the Meditations, Descartes casts doubt on ev erything -including religion- in his search for absolute certainty. In the Third Meditation, he doubts the existence of God before providing his scratch line rationalistic proof for the existence of God. In offering the proof, he set-back questions whether there is a God (25). However, even though he questions Gods very existence, Descartes maintains his unconditional idea of God. After some deliberation, he concludes that because he has an innate idea of God, (which is not fabricated by the see or drawn from the senses), it must be God who endowed him with his innate idea. Descartes likens his innate idea of God to the mark of a craftsmen impressed upon his turn over similar to a stamp which says Made by God. Additionally, Descartes reasons that because he exists as a thinking thing and ... ...od to exist. As the above has illustrated, twain Descartes and Leibniz believed that the existence of God could be proved via reason. But, Hume and Kant, which will be later covere d, did not believe argumentation or reason could establish the existence of God(3)David Hume attacks both Descartes and Leibnizs methodology for establishing the existence of God in the following there is an evident absurdity in pretending to argue a matter of fact, or to prove it by any arguments a priori. Nothing is demonstrable, unless the contrary implies a contradiction. Nothing, that is distinctly conceivable, implies a contradiction. Whatever we believe as existent, we can also conceive as non-existent. There is no being, therefore, whose non-existence implies a contradiction. Consequently there is no being, whose existence is demonstrable (Bailey, 79).