Essay Midterm Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Midterm - Essay ExampleThis paper allow cotton up and analyze the similarities and differences between Kant and Aquinas concepts of morals and the moral value of actions. The positive and negative aspects of both concepts will then be analyzed for their application to a culturally diverse society.Both Kant and Aquinas enlarge a great significance to the role of practical reason in ethical life. Among opposite similarities in thinking, both philosophers emphasize on the immensity of law in ethics and both make claims that real kinds of actions are good and evil in them selves (Hinton, 2002).Practical reason refers to the general human capacity for firmness through reflection, the question of what to do. It considers a set of alternatives to determine what ought to be done (Wallace, 2003). Kant and Aquinas agreed that ethics are derived from practical reasoning and suggested that this concept allows one to distinguish good actions from bad ones.Emphasizing the importance of law in ethics, Aquinas establishes the concept of Natural Law which refers to ones compliance to the order of reason which directs the will. Kant focuses on the concept of Universal law emphasizing that one is obliged to conform to duty by laws that be relevant to us.The dissimilarity among the concepts of right the thinking of Aquinas and Kant emerge the very basic level of the basics of ethics. Aquinas held that what is good should always hold superiority oer what is right. Kant on the other hand toss out this dogma with his own core concept of ethics. He believed that what is right should always hold priority over what is good. His concepts of ethics were based on the thought that moral obligation should be consequential of nothing other than duty. Kant believed the notion of duty to be supreme. For him an action held no moral importance if it was not backed by the motive of duty.Aquinas and Kants principles of ethics also differed in terms of